USPTO serial 77976299
CHEMIMAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3558935Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2009
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHEMIMAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PITTSBURGH, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori E. Harrison
Lori E. Harrison Pepper Hamilton LLPEighteenth and Arch Streets3000 Two Logan SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Imaging systems and instrumentation, comprised of one or more of the following, computer hardware for affixing an identifying mark onto an object and hardware for scanning and identifying a mark on an object, computer software used to affix an identifying mark on an object and to scan and identify the mark, spectroscopes, endoscopes, fiberscopes, microscopes and probes for scientific and anti-counterfeiting use in analyzing materials at a molecular level | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 27, 2006 |
| 041 | Education and training in the nature of classes, seminars, workshops and courses in the field of chemical analysis techniques and methods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 27, 2006 |
| 042 | Chemical analysis and testing; development, evaluation, testing, and demonstration of new products and equipment, namely, scientific instrumentation; development and testing of chemical analysis techniques and methods; modeling and computer simulations in the field of chemical and biological analysis and testing; chemical analysis and development, namely, elemental and chemical speciation analysis and development; chemical analysis and development, namely, chemical statistical analysis and development; chemical analysis and development, namely, ultra-trace elemental analysis and development; problem solving using chemical analyses and testing; materials testing and evaluation; chemical, biochemical, and biological materials, biological, biomedical, and water analysis; forensics analysis using chemical, biological, biomedical and biochemical methods and techniques; chemical imaging, raman imaging, fluorescence imaging for scientific, industrial, commercial and non-medical purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 27, 2006 |
| 044 | Chemical imaging, raman imaging, fluorescence imaging for medical purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 27, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHEMIMAGE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ChemImage Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ChemImage Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ChemImage Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CHEMIMAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |