Drawing for ECLIPSE

USPTO serial 77976327

ECLIPSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECLIPSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024pet blankets, cloth coasters, elastic straps for luggage, namely, bands of elastic fabric to be stretched around luggage for the purpose of luggage identification, handkerchiefs, plastic place mats, plastic table covers and potholdersACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILEDโ€”
Oct 7, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Sep 27, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Sep 27, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILEDโ€”
Mar 17, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Mar 17, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Mar 17, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2015NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Jun 29, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Jun 26, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Jun 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Jun 11, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
Jun 3, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
May 13, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEYโ€”
Apr 29, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 8, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
Feb 6, 2015RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILEDโ€”
Feb 6, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETEDโ€”
Jan 26, 2015ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Jan 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Oct 31, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTABโ€”
Oct 29, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jul 16, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
May 6, 2014RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILEDโ€”
May 6, 2014RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILEDโ€”
May 5, 2014CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTENโ€”
Mar 17, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTIONโ€”
Sep 9, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Mar 4, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Feb 10, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTEREDโ€”
Feb 10, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVEDโ€”
Aug 17, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Jul 19, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTIONโ€”
Jan 19, 2012CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Jan 18, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Jan 13, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 23, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEYโ€”
Sep 19, 2011RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILEDโ€”
Sep 19, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETEDโ€”
Aug 1, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEYโ€”
Aug 1, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTEDโ€”
Aug 1, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEYโ€”
Aug 1, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTABโ€”
Jul 29, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Jul 29, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jul 27, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jan 25, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Nov 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Nov 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Nov 8, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
May 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 4, 2010AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTEREDโ€”
Mar 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Feb 7, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDโ€”
Feb 1, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance