USPTO serial 77976341
PEOPLE PROCESS TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3804796Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2010
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PEOPLE PROCESS TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark C. Comtois
Mark C. Comtois Duane Morris LLP505 9th Street NW, Suite 1000Washington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2007 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CLASSES, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, INTERACTIVE COURSES, AND SIMULATIONS IN THE FIELD OF OPTIMIZING BUSINESS PROCESSES AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS; TRAINING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DEMAND PLANNING AND FORECASTING, LOGISTICS, SUPPLY CHAIN PLANNING AND SUPPLY PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, CAPACITY PLANNING, PRODUCTION PLANNING AND SCHEDULING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Plan4Demand Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Plan4Demand Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Plan4Demand Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PEOPLE PROCESS TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |