Drawing for QUEST

USPTO serial 77976392

QUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with QUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark C. Comtois

MARK C. COMTOIS DUANE MORRIS LLP505 9TH STREET, N.W.SUITE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting services, namely, demand planning and forecasting, logistics, supply chain planning and supply planning, transportation management, capacity planning, production planning and schedulingACTIVEMar 14, 2006
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, namely, PROVIDING CLASSES, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, INTERACTIVE COURSES, AND SIMULATIONS IN THE FIELD OF OPTIMIZING BUSINESS PROCESSES AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS IN THE FIELD OF DEMAND PLANNING AND FORECASTING, LOGISTICS, SUPPLY CHAIN PLANNING AND SUPPLY PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, CAPACITY PLANNING, PRODUCTION PLANNING AND SCHEDULING; TRAINING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DEMAND PLANNING AND FORECASTING, LOGISTICS, SUPPLY CHAIN PLANNING AND SUPPLY PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, CAPACITY PLANNING, PRODUCTION PLANNING AND SCHEDULINGACTIVEMar 14, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 14, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 24, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 24, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 29, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 24, 2009CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 29, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 4, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 18, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2008INOAAMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 20, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 19, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance