USPTO serial 77976581
INTERFACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3610700Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 2009
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTERFACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael P. Brennan
Michael P. Brennan Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.Post Office Box 828Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING NON-DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS, NAMELY, PROVIDING PROGRAMMING INSTRUCTIONS FOR DEVELOPING PLUG-IN SOFTWARE FOR USE IN INTEGRATING THE USER'S HARDWARE, SOFTWARE OR FIRMWARE PRODUCTS WITH THE APPLICANT'S COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE USED IN CONTROLLING AND MANAGING SERVER HARDWARE AND DATA CENTER DEVICES; PROVIDING CUSTOMIZATION, TESTING AND SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE PURPOSE OF INTEGRATING USER'S HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE WITH THE APPLICANT'S HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, VALIDATION THAT USER'S PROGRAMMING WILL PROPERLY INTEGRATE WITH APPLICANT'S HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IF USER'S PROGRAMMING WILL NOT PROPERLY INTEGRATE WITH APPLICANT'S HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; CUSTOMIZATION OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE AND ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE TESTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE VENDORS AND THEIR PRODUCTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |