Drawing for AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE

USPTO serial 77976619

AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy D. Pecsenye

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME LLP9TH FLOOR ONE LOGAN SQUAREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business information management in the field of heavy civil construction; supply services for third parties in the field of construction materials, namely, purchase of aggregate, asphalt, and concrete for other companiesABANDONEDMay 6, 1998
037Building construction for residential, commercial, and institutional use; excavation servicesABANDONEDMay 6, 1998
040Quarry services in the nature of stone-crushingABANDONEDMay 6, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 19, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 19, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 19, 2011OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 23, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 5, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 18, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 13, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 12, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 24, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 29, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 15, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 23, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 20, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 20, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 20, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 21, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance