USPTO serial 77976619
AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Pecsenye
TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME LLP9TH FLOOR ONE LOGAN SQUAREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business information management in the field of heavy civil construction; supply services for third parties in the field of construction materials, namely, purchase of aggregate, asphalt, and concrete for other companies | ABANDONED | May 6, 1998 |
| 037 | Building construction for residential, commercial, and institutional use; excavation services | ABANDONED | May 6, 1998 |
| 040 | Quarry services in the nature of stone-crushing | ABANDONED | May 6, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Infrastructure, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Infrastructure, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |