USPTO serial 77976741
FOODELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3643528Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2009
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FOODELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Park City, UT
Park City, UT
Park City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matt Hutchinson
MATT HUTCHINSON MILLER VANCE & THOMPSONPO BOX 6828002200 North Park Ave.PARK CITY, UT 84068-2800Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, transmission of voice, data, documents, and video relating to all aspects of food preparation and consumption, namely, information regarding food preparation techniques, recipes, ingredient reviews, kitchen equipment reviews, restaurant reviews, menus, nutrition, food-related events and shopping lists | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 18, 2008 |
| 041 | Education, namely, training services in the field of food preparation, namely, training with respect to food preparation techniques, recipes, ingredient selection, kitchen equipment selection, food terms and definitions, and shopping lists | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 18, 2008 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for the indexing of information provided on an Internet web site for users' personal use; providing on-line non-downloadable software for the generation and on-line publication of web postings by users featuring food-related content, namely, recipes, restaurant reviews, product reviews, and food preparation technique demonstration videos | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 18, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Foodell, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Foodell, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Foodell, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FOODELL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |