USPTO serial 77976844
BEAD BLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAD BLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farnham, Surrey, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter T. Holsen
PETER T. HOLSEN ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL, LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in the circulatory system, namely, syringes; surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for embolization | ACTIVE | Dec 16, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |