Drawing for DESIGNHOTELSCOLLECTION#

USPTO serial 77976950

DESIGNHOTELSCOLLECTION#

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DESIGNHOTELSCOLLECTION#?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arturo Perez-Guerrero

BARBARA H. LOEWENTHAL GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN, P.C.270 MADISON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and advertisement services; Business management; Business administration and office workABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 27, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 27, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 27, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 30, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 30, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 31, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 26, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 16, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 31, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 9, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 9, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 9, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 9, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance