USPTO serial 77977218
NIRVANIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3644898Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2009
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NIRVANIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kent M Walker
Anne H. Peck COOLEY LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing electronic transmission and distribution of files, data, electronic media, digital content, images, text, messages, documents, audio content and video content for others; providing Internet bandwidth connectivity services for the files, data, electronic media, digital content, images, text, messages, documents, audio content and video content for others; on-line computer services for transferring files, databases, data, electronic media, digital content, images, text, messages, documents, audio content, video content, and other electronic data at multiple server locations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2007 |
| 039 | Storage services for archiving files, databases, data, electronic media, digital content, images, text, messages, documents, audio content, video content, and other electronic data; storage of files, databases, data, electronic media, digital content, images, text, messages, documents, audio content, video content, and other electronic data for others; on-line computer services for storing files, databases, data, electronic media, digital content, images, text, messages, documents, audio content, video content, and other electronic data; on-line computer services for storing files, databases, data, electronic media, digital content, images, text, messages, documents, audio content, video content, and other electronic data at multiple server locations; storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data, namely, providing high capacity file, database, data, electronic media, digital content, image, text, message, document, audio content and video content online storage for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2007 |
| 042 | Providing high capacity file, database, data, electronic media, digital content, image, text, message, document, audio content and video content online hosting and management for others; application service provider (ASP) services, namely, providing on-line, non-downloadable software for hosting, storing and managing files, databases, data, electronic media, digital content, images, text, messages, documents, audio content and video content | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Streamload, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NIRVANIX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NIRVANIX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NIRVANIX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NIRVANIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |