Drawing for DR. MOM

USPTO serial 77977907

DR. MOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR. MOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas M. Champagne

THOMAS M. CHAMPAGNE IP STRATEGIES, P.C.1048 DEAD RUN DRIVEMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Fingernail clippers, fingernail scissors, nail files, emery boardsACTIVE—
011Baby bottle sterilizers, electric vaporizers, humidifiers, ozone sanitizers for air and water, air purifiersACTIVE—
020Mats for infant playpens, baby head support cushions, portable baby bath seats for use in bath tubs, bumper guards for cribs, bed pillows, bed rests, head supporting pillows, maternity pillows, baby bolstersACTIVE—
021Hair combs, hair brushes, bath brushes, nail brushes, toothbrushesACTIVE—
024Children's blankets, crib bumper pads, crib bumpers, bed padsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 9, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 13, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 2, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 22, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance