USPTO serial 77978130
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SANDY, UT
Residential Acceptance Network, Inc.
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Residential Acceptance Network, Inc.
Residential Acceptance Network, Inc.
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Residential Acceptance Network, Inc.
Residential Acceptance Network, Inc.
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Residential Acceptance Network, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent T. Winder
Brent T. Winder Winder Intellectual Property Law LLCP.O. Box 512Salem, UT 84653UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Matching borrowers with potential lenders in the field of mortgage lending; Real estate auctions; Advertising and marketing; Marketing consulting; Promotion and marketing services and related consulting; Direct mail advertising; Business marketing and direct mail consulting services | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2007 |
| 036 | Mortgage banking services, namely, origination, acquisition, servicing, securitization and brokerage of mortgage loans; Mortgage brokerage; Mortgage lending; Real estate agencies; Real estate brokerage; Real estate escrow services; Maintaining mortgage escrow accounts | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |