USPTO serial 77978267
YENKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2010
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with YENKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntington Beach, CA
GENERAL MARKETING CAPITAL, INC.
WESTMINSTER, CA
GENERAL MARKETING CAPITAL, INC.
WESTMINSTER, CA
GENERAL MARKETING CAPITAL, INC.
WESTMINSTER, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D. Buyan
Robert D. Buyan STOUT, UXA & BUYAN, LLP23172 Plaza Pointe Drive, Suite 110Laguna Hills, CA 92653UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motor vehicle accessories, namely, automobile body emblems and license plate frames | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Classic Camaro, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL MARKETING CAPITAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL MARKETING CAPITAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL MARKETING CAPITAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named YENKO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 15, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 10, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |