USPTO serial 77978463
NO JUNK PROMISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3738167Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 2010
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NO JUNK PROMISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lance J. Lieberman
LANCE J. LIEBERMAN Cozen O'Connor277 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10172UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FOOD PRODUCTS AND PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, YOGURT, FRUIT BASED SNACK FOOD; PREPARED AND PACKAGED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF VEGETABLES, MEAT OR POULTRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | FOOD PRODUCTS AND PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, COOKIES, CRACKERS, BISCUITS, GRAIN BASED SNACK FOODS, BREAKFAST CEREALS, CEREAL BASED SNACK FOODS, READY-TO-EAT CEREALS, PROCESSED CEREALS, RICE CAKES, SWEETENED YOGURT COVERED WHOLE GRAIN SNACKS, CORN BASED SNACK FOODS, CHEESE BASED SNACK FOODS, NAMELY, CHEESE FLAVORED WHOLE GRAIN-BASED SNACK FOODS AND CHEESE FLAVORED BAKED CORN-BASED SNACK FOODS; PREPARED AND PACKAGED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beech-Nut Nutrition Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Beech-Nut Nutrition Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Beech-Nut Nutrition Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NO JUNK PROMISE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 5, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |