USPTO serial 77978777
NOVATECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2010
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NOVATECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
13600 La Ciotat, FR
13600 La Ciotat, FR
13600 La Ciotat, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day35 West 35th StreetSuite 900New York, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | [ DRUG ELUDING STENTS, VALVES OR SPIGOTS FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF THE AIRFLOW IN THE LUNG AND LUNG CANAL AND FOR USE IN BRONCHO PLEURAL FISTULAE, INTRACTABLE PNEUMATHORAX, HAEMOPTISY OR BLEEDING AND IN ENDOSCOPIC LUNG REDUCTION; SURGICAL IMPLANTS COMPRISING ARTIFICIAL TISSUES AND MATERIALS; MEDICAL, SURGICAL AND DENTAL APPARATUS, ] INSTRUMENTS AND IMPLANTS, NAMELY, [ PHONATORY STENTS, ] TRACHEAL STENTS, BRONCHIAL STENTS, [ LARYNGEAL STENTS, ] STENOTICAL STENTS, [ ESOPHAGEAL STENTS, ] ENDOLUMINAL STENTS; STENTS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF AIRWAY OBSTRUCTIONS, [ AIRWAY MANAGEMENT PLUGS AND VALVES, LARYNGEAL STENT-GRAFTS, TRACHEAL STENT-GRAFTS; TRACHEOTOMY TUBES, ] RESPIRATORY PROSTHESIS, NAMELY, TUBULAR ENDOPROSTHESIS FOR ANATOMICAL CONDUITS, TRACHEO-BRONCHIAL PROSTHESIS; PROSTHETIC TUBES FOR THE BRONCHIAL TREE, TRACHEA AND BRONCHI [ AND THE ESOPHAGUS; ] ENDOPROSTHESIS, NAMELY, ENDOTRACHEAL PROSTHESIS FOR INJURY OR INOPERABLE MAJOR AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION; TUBULAR SILICONE RUBBER PROSTHESIS FOR THE BRONCHIAL TREE, THE TRACHEA AND BRONCHI [ AND THE ESOPHAGUS; ] INSTRUMENTS FOR THE POSITIONING OF AIRWAY MANAGEMENT DEVICES, [ INSTRUMENTS FOR IMPLANTATION OR INSERTION OF A PROSTHESIS IN A VESSEL, ] APPARATUS STENT-INTRODUCER FOR GUIDING PROSTHESIS, ENDOSCOPE FOR INSERTING A PROSTHESIS OR A TUBE INTO A STENT INTRODUCER, [ APPLICATORS FOR ELASTIC BIOMATERIALS FOR PLACING, REMOVING AND DISLOCATING STENTS; ] MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, [ ENDOSCOPES, RIGID AND FLEXIBLE SCOPES, BRONCHOSCOPES, BONE STERILIZERS; ] FORCEPS, [ TROCARS FOR PLEURAL LIQUID SUCTION AND/OR BIOPSY, ESPECIALLY PLEURAL BIOPSY; PROBES FOR RIGID SCOPES FOR RIGID BRONCHOSCOPY PROCEDURE AND STENT PLACEMENT UNDER RIGID BRONCHOSCOPY PROCEDURES; TUBES FOR RIGID BRONCHOSCOPY AND SYRINGES AND PUMPS THEREFORE; AEROSOL DISPENSERS, NEEDLES, CATHETER CAPS, ALL FOR MEDICAL USE; SILICONE SHEETS FOR TISSUE SUPPORT AND TISSUE REPLACEMENT AND TREATMENT OF SCARS, SILICONE SUSPENDING CORDS FOR SURGERY VESSEL LOOPS; MEDICAL APPLICATORS FOR ELASTIC BIOMATERIALS, NAMELY, INTERNAL ANATOMICAL DUCTS AND CONDUITS; MEDICAL EQUIPMENT FOR VIDEO ENDOSCOPY ANESTHESIA SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF RESPIRATORY, ANESTHESIA AND REANIMATION FILTERS, HUMIDIFIERS, ANESTHESIA CIRCUITS, WATER TRAPS ] | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 24, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |