USPTO serial 77978794
CITI MOBILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITI MOBILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greene
JEFFREY H. GREENE FOLEY & LARDNER LLP90 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the goods and services of others via the telephone and the global communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |