USPTO serial 77979007
SONEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SONEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LANEFOURTH FLOORALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | internal combustion engines for unmanned aerial vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNR1 | NOTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |