Drawing for FOXHALL RESORT

USPTO serial 77979178

FOXHALL RESORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FOXHALL RESORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hugh O. Nowell

3575 Piedmont Rd NE bldg 15 Suite L120ATLANTA, GA 30305UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041country clubs; golf club services; health club services, namely, providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical exerciseACTIVEJan 1, 2010
043resort hotel services; resort lodging servicesACTIVEJan 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2010CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 25, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 22, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 22, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 30, 2009WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2009WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 24, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 25, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance