USPTO serial 77979257
WORKSHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WORKSHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jami A. Gekas
JAMI A. GEKAS Edwards Wildman Palmer LLPP.O. Box 130F.D.R. StationNew York, NY 10150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, "e"-shaped clips for use as hand tools, hand jacks, hand-operated ratcheting cable pullers, sanding tools in the nature of sanding blocks, sanding pads for non-electric, hand-operated sanders, and hand tools, namely, sanders; hand-operated nut splitters, screw extractors and disc brake pad spreaders; manual coil spring compressor sets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICHIGAN INDUSTRIAL TOOLS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Amash Imports, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Amash Imports, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named WORKSHOP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |