USPTO serial 77979464
GREENLEADER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREENLEADER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben D. Tobor
BEN D. TOBOR GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP1000 LOUISIANA STREET, SUITE 1700HOUSTON, TX 77002-5018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Disposal of waste treated in bioreactors; waste disposal for others; collection of trash; and collection of refuse for recycling | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Refuse collection/transport and storage; and storage, distribution, and supply of methane gas | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of pollution and control systems and equipment for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Waste Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Waste Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GREENLEADER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |