USPTO serial 77979543
PETVILLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4072420Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 20, 2011
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PETVILLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Kim
JOHN M. KIM IP Legal Advisors, P.C.4445 Eastgate Mall, Suite 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92121UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software; video game programs; and game related computer software applications, namely, computer software for playing social games; interactive video game programs; computer software to enable uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information in the fields of virtual communities, electronic gaming, entertainment, and general interest via the Internet or other communications networks with third parties | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 2, 2009 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer, video and electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games, enhancements within online computer games, and game applications within online computer games; providing online reviews of computer games, providing of information relating to computer games; providing an Internet website portal in the field of computer games and gaming; Entertainment services, namely, providing virtual environments in which users can interact through social games for recreational, leisure or entertainment purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 2, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zynga Game Network, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ZYNGA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZYNGA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZYNGA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PETVILLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |