USPTO serial 77979644
IBST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3853616Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2010
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IBST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
University of the West of England, Bristol
Bristol, GB
Other trademarks owned by University of the West of England, Bristol
University of the West of England, Bristol
Bristol, GB
Other trademarks owned by University of the West of England, Bristol
University of the West of England, Bristol
Bristol, GB
Other trademarks owned by University of the West of England, Bristol
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley U. North, III
STANLEY U. NORTH, III LECLAIRRYAN2 PENN PLZ ENEWARK, NJ 07105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Medical and scientific research and analysis in the fields of biochemistry, biologics, life sciences, biotechnology, biology, medical science; providing information on the subject of scientific research and analysis in the fields of biochemistry, biologics, life sciences, biotechnology, biology, medical science and medicine; genotyping of blood groups for scientific research purposes using samples derived via screenings for haemolytic disease | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 18, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by University of the West of England, Bristol
- Other trademarks owned by University of the West of England, Bristol
- Other trademarks owned by University of the West of England, Bristol
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IBST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |