USPTO serial 77979705
GI JAMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2010
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with GI JAMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Henderson, NV
Henderson, NV
Henderson, NV
Henderson, NV
Palm Springs, CA
Palm Springs, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting in the nature of streaming of audio and video material on the Internet | ACTIVE | Nov 9, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schippers, Biddy
- Other trademarks owned by Schippers, Biddy
- Other trademarks owned by Randell, Denny
- Other trademarks owned by Randell, Denny
- Other trademarks owned by Randell, Denny
- Other trademarks owned by Schippers, Biddy
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named GI JAMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 27, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 27, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| May 13, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |