Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77979740?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77979740. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns ENVIRONMENTALLY BEAUTIFUL?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77979740, the listed owner(s) include: Masonite International Corporation, Masonite International Corporation.

What is USPTO serial number 77979740?

Serial number 77979740 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark ENVIRONMENTALLY BEAUTIFUL. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of ENVIRONMENTALLY BEAUTIFUL?

ENVIRONMENTALLY BEAUTIFUL (77979740) currently shows USPTO status code 607 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover ENVIRONMENTALLY BEAUTIFUL?

The public record lists International Classes: 006. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77979740

ENVIRONMENTALLY BEAUTIFUL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607

Filing date: Feb 6, 2008
Status date: Sep 23, 2011
Registration date: —
Examiner: CARL III, FRED
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENVIRONMENTALLY BEAUTIFUL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Masonite International Corporation
Mississauga, CA
Other trademarks owned by Masonite International Corporation
Masonite International Corporation
Mississauga, CA
Other trademarks owned by Masonite International Corporation

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph W. Berenato, III

JOSEPH W. BERENATO, III BERENATO, WHITE & STAVISH, LLC6550 ROCK SPRING DR STE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817-1173UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
006	doors made of metal	ACTIVE	May 6, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 23, 2011	MAB7	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT	—
Sep 23, 2011	ABN7	ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT	—
May 26, 2011	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2011	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Feb 23, 2011	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2011	CNFR	SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2011	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Jan 13, 2011	SUPC	STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Jan 13, 2011	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Jan 13, 2011	DPCC	DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Dec 14, 2010	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Dec 14, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 9, 2010	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 24, 2010	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Nov 24, 2010	DRRR	DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED	—
Nov 24, 2010	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2010	ERTD	TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED	—
Oct 13, 2010	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 7, 2010	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2010	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2010	CNRT	SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2010	DPCC	DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
May 28, 2010	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
May 28, 2010	DRRR	DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED	—
May 28, 2010	ERTD	TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED	—
May 28, 2010	EISU	TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED	The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 28, 2010	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
May 26, 2010	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
May 26, 2010	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
May 26, 2010	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2010	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Jan 7, 2010	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Nov 17, 2009	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Nov 17, 2009	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2009	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2009	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jan 23, 2009	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jan 23, 2009	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jan 9, 2009	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jan 7, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 7, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 7, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2009	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jan 7, 2009	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Nov 7, 2008	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 7, 2008	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 11, 2008	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—