Drawing for ORIBE

USPTO serial 77979751

ORIBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3836235Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 17, 2010
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with ORIBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert P. Michal

Robert P. Michal Carter, DeLuca & Farrell LLP576 Broad Hollow RoadMelville, NY 11747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair colorants; Hair creams; Hair gel; Hair gels; Hair lotions; Hair pomades; Hair spray; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair masks, Styling gels; Hair shampoos; Hair conditionersACTIVEDec 8, 2008
035Wholesale distributorships featuring hair care products for salons; consulting services, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of hair salonsACTIVEDec 8, 2008
044[ Salon services, namely, hair salons ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 8, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2020NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2020RNL3REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Apr 20, 20209G8PREGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8—
Apr 9, 2020E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2020EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 13, 2020PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Jan 13, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 27, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 25, 2019E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2016NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2016C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 2, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 29, 2015E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2015REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 13, 2010SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2010REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2010CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 5, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 4, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 4, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 4, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 26, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 26, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 26, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 6, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 5, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 4, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 4, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 4, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 17, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 17, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 1, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 29, 2009PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Sep 1, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 15, 2009PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 27, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 8, 2009CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2009GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2009GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2009CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance