USPTO serial 77979812
Serial No. 77979812
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2010
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 77979812?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
TULSA, OK
Dallas, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George R. Schultz
GEORGE R. SCHULTZ SCHULTZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.5400 LBJ FREEWAYSUITE 1200DALLAS, TX 75240-1067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal and non-leather key chains and key chain tags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2006 |
| 021 | Coffee cups; plastic water bottles sold empty; cups; insulated containers for beverages cans for domestic use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2006 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, sweatshirts, t-shirts, polo-shirts, button shirts, jackets, hats, visors, pants and shorts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tigerflow Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tigerflow Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TIGERFLOW SYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Tigerflow Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |