USPTO serial 77979839
COGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3862115Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 2010
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ST. PAUL, MN
PASADENA, CA
Pasadena, CA
Pasadena, CA
So. Pasadena, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. Voegeli
James F. Voegeli 3M Innovative Properties Company3M Center, 2501 Hudson Road220-9E-01St. Paul, MN 55144Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION; [AND SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENT, NAMELY, BIOLOGICAL APPARATUS FOR BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION] AND VERIFICATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 3M COGENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GEMALTO COGENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COGENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COGENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COGENT, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named COGENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 12, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |