USPTO serial 77980135
AMPAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3878146Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 16, 2010
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMPAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane M. Reed
DIANE M. REED KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STFL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-8214Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, motors and engines, namely, thrusters for satellites, bipropellant thrusters, liquid rocket engines, tanks and propulsion systems comprised of monopropellant thrusters, bipropellant thrusters, altitude controls, peroxide thrusters, electric propulsion, apogee engines and rolling diaphragm tanks for commercial military launch vehicles and spacecraft, monopropellant and bipropellant rocket engines for satellite altitude control and orbit insertion, and diaphragm propellant tanks and propulsion systems comprised of monopropellant thrusters, bipropellant thrusters, altitude controls, peroxide thrusters, electric propulsion, apogee engines and rolling diaphragm tanks for spacecraft and missile intercept applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 26, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Pacific Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by American Pacific Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by American Pacific Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by AMPAC FINE CHEMICALS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named AMPAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |