USPTO serial 77980520
THE MONTECITO DIET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE MONTECITO DIET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John G. Posa
JOHN G POSA GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSONPO BOX 7021TROY, MI 48007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, books, magazines, newsletters, brochures, and pamphlets concerning health, nutrition, illness prevention, detoxification, diet and lifestyle choices | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 19, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |