USPTO serial 77980555
EDGEWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3881712Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 23, 2010
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDGEWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hot Springs, AR
Hot Springs, AR
SMITH'S CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC.
HOT SPRINGS, AR
Hot Springs, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Bennett Perkins
KATHRYN BENNETT PERKINS ROSE LAW FIRMP.O. Box 4800Fayetteville, AR 72702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand operated kitchen tools, namely, slicers, choppers and mandolins for cutting food | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Feb 12, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith Abrasives, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith Abrasives, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SMITH'S CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith Abrasives, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named EDGEWARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |