USPTO serial 77981666
STINGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4039242Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2011
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STINGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KOWLOON, HK
Aggressive Development International Limited
Kowloon, HK
Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
Aggressive Development International Limited
Kowloon, HK
Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
Aggressive Development International Limited
Kowloon, HK
Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terese Cohen
Brian E. Lacey, Esq. WaltersLacey LLP35 India StreetSuite 300Boston, MA 02110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective sport helmets for skating, skate boarding, bicycling, and hockey | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2007 |
| 028 | Ice skates; in-line skates; roller skates; quad skates; shoe skates, namely, pairs of wheels which affix to footwear for pleasure and sports use; skate boards; protective gear, namely, knee guards, elbow guards, and wrist guards for athletic use; hockey goals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LIME ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named STINGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |