USPTO serial 77981832
D&F
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D&F?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pablo Meles
PABLO MELES GUNTIN MELES & GUST, PLC304 INDIAN TRCE # 750WESTON, FL 33326-2996UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Website maintenance of on-line games for others; maintenance of computer software for on-line games; development of computer software; updating of computer software for on line games; advisory services in the field of computer software development; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; recovery of computer data; computer rental | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |