USPTO serial 77982022
ROBOT SUIT HAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3994777Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 2011
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROBOT SUIT HAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagae
JERALD E. NAGAE Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Robotic exoskeleton suits worn by humans and controlled through intentional and autonomous control mechanisms for the purpose of enhancing the strength and endurance of the person wearing the suit and amplifying human bodily functions of the wearer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Physical rehabilitation equipment designed for ambulation exercise; physical rehabilitation equipment designed for lower limb motion exercise; exercise machines worn by humans and controlled through intentional and autonomous control mechanisms for the purpose of enhancing and amplifying human bodily functions of the wearer for medical and rehabilitation purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Sports equipment worn by humans and controlled through intentional and autonomous control mechanisms for the purpose of enhancing and amplifying human bodily functions of the wearer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CYBERDYNE Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CYBERDYNE Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CYBERDYNE Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ROBOT SUIT HAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 12, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 6, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 6, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |