USPTO serial 77982032
FLIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2011
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FLIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Thousand Oaks, CA
Wilsonville, OR
Wilsonville, OR
Wilsonville, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Zoetewey
David Zoetewey Teledyne1049 Camino Dos RiosThousand Oaks, CA 91360UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Precision reticules and reticule assemblies and electro optical gimbals; apparatus for detecting, measuring, recording, transmitting, analyzing, and reproducing images and sound, namely, gimbals, security cameras, and multi-sensors with daylight tv and geo pointing capabilities; hand held optical weapon sight products, namely, image intensified weapon sights, and optically fused weapon sights; laser designators; read out integrated circuits; infrared thermal cameras for building diagnostics, energy auditing and home inspection, property and facility management, HVAC and plumbing, moisture and restoration, automation and safety, electrical and mechanical, utilities, manufacturing industries, service companies, electrical contractors, gas imaging for petrochemical and refineries, SF6 gas detection, oil and gas extraction, environmental enforcement, municipal gas distribution, and service companies, range phenomenology, tracking, high speed/stop motion, laser designation, directed energy weapons, and research and development; cameras and related operating software used in conjunction with report generation, building applications, research and development, tracking systems for tracking persons, objects, and other targets comprised of pixel resolution, windowing full frame rate, integration time range, digital output, noise-equivalent temperature differentiation (NETD), filter wheel, optical interface, analogue signals, lens, mounting, and power supply; pointing systems for pointing out persons, objects, crystalline laser materials and other targets comprised of daylight/color ccd tv camera, electron-multiplying ccd (EMCCD) camera, eye safe laser range finder, laser pointer, stabilized gimbals, and electronic control unit; guidance systems comprised of daylight camera, laser payloads, system interfaces, namely, laser spot tracker, navigation/radar interface, display and recorder, moving map systems, digital video output for the purpose of navigating, guiding and controlling air, land and maritime vehicles without direct or continuous human control; global positioning systems; remote control systems comprised of remote controls for ergonomic hand control unit, laptop control unit, and electronic simplified control unit for clamp-on electric meters, digital and/or analog multimeters, power supplies, fiber optic power meters, thermometers, humidity meters, airflow meters, light meters, sound level meters, tachometers, pressure meters, calibrators, water quality meter; mounting devices for tilt domes; Computer software for connecting together middle ware platforms, namely, servers and network protocols with graphical user interface software; operating software for security cameras, thermal energy and stabilized camera systems; software for real time analysis of radiometric thermal imaging in the field of HVAC and plumbing, moisture and restoration, automation and safety, electrical and mechanical, utilities, manufacturing industries, service companies, electrical contractors, gas imaging for petrochemical and refineries, SF6 gas detection, oil and gas extraction, environmental enforcement, municipal gas distribution, and service companies, range phenomenology, tracking, high speed/stop motion, laser designation, directed energy weapons, and research and development; software used for predictive maintenance and operating science cameras; pre-recorded media in the form of DVD, CD Rom, flash drives, tapes, featuring information about electronic vision systems, videos, data and sound | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 1980 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting live and web-based seminars and classes in the field of infrared thermography technology and applications and distribution of course materials in connection therewith; educational services, namely, developing courses and seminars for others in the field of infrared thermography technology and applications and distribution of course materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELEDYNE FLIR, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FLIR Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FLIR Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FLIR Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FLIR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 24, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 3, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |