USPTO serial 77982304
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ELEMENT SIX (TRADE MARKS) LIMITED
COUNTY CLARE, IE
County Clare, IE
County Clare, IE
County Clare, IE
ELEMENT SIX (TRADE MARKS) LIMITED
COUNTY CLARE, IE
COUNTY CLARE, IE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Fredbeck
Andrew N. Fredbeck Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on 44(e)) Abrasives, grinding preparations and polishing preparations for drills, saw blades, band saw blades, hacksaws, frame saws, concrete polishing, ore drill bits, wire beads, impregnated bits, roller cone bits, twist drills, wear parts, grinding wheels, grinding tips, rotary dressers, dresser logs for single and multiple log dressers, profile dressers, straight and profiled routers, polishing cups, single point tools, calibration rollers, wire drawing dies, single point turning tools, gauge materials and hard facing; diamond grit, metal coated diamond grit, diamond powder and powder compounds used as abrasives and for grinding and polishing for industrial use in the fields of automotive, aerospace, construction, stone, precision polishing, oil and gas, and mining | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | (Based on 44(e)) Machines and machine tools for cutting, grinding, polishing, sawing, drilling and lapping; machine and machine tool parts, namely, cutting blades, cutting inserts, drill bits, abrasive wheels, abrasive discs, compacts, cutting tips, wires and wire drawing dies, all being parts of the aforementioned machines and machine tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | (Based on 44(e)) Diamond components for scientific, optical, signaling, checking or laboratory apparatus and instruments, apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, for data processing equipment, for computers and for telecommunications apparatus and instruments, namely, Schottky diodes, strain gauges, field effect transistors and metal semi-conductor field-effect transistors, fourier transform infrared accessories for high power x-rays, namely, windows, prisms, wedge plates and intereferometer plates, optical lenses for optical data storage systems, windows, lenses, beam-splitters, prisms, wedge plates and intereferometer plates; and etalons for high end industrial equipment, namely, high power lasers, equipment used for infrared spectroscopy and analysis, high power microwaves and filters; windows and lenses used for high power x-rays, for infrared diagnosis and treatment equipment and for endoscopy; diamond lenses for reading and writing to and from digital storage media, namely, DVDs used for computer games, videos and high capacity data storage devices, windows and lenses for laser television, windows and lenses for infrared night vision cameras, tweeter diaphragms for loudspeakers, solid-immersion optical lenses for optical data storage systems, etalons for lasers pumping the internet; semi-conductors; ISFET (ion sensitive field effect transistors) for monitoring chemical species in solution, surface field effect transistors, polarisation enhanced field effect transistors; thermal substrates and optical windows in VESCELSs (vertical external cavity surface emitting lasers); Raman laser (Raman medium) not for medical purposes; hand operated scientific instruments, namely, microtome and ultramicrotome knives | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | (Based on 44(e)) [ Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments, namely, knives, scalpels and micro-cutting blades; artificial joints and implants; intraocular lenses; Raman laser (Raman medium) for medical purposes ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 31, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 31, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2010 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |