USPTO serial 77982396
LAST EXIT LAST EXIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4272589Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2013
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LAST EXIT LAST EXIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aggressive Development International Limited
Kowloon, HK
Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
Aggressive Development International Limited
Kowloon, HK
Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
Aggressive Development International Limited
Kowloon, HK
Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
KOWLOON, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pollie Gautsch
Pollie Gautsch G & A Legal, APC665 San Rodolfo Dr. #124-209Solana Beach, CA 92075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective sports helmets for skating, skate boarding, bicycling, and hockey | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2008 |
| 028 | Ice skates; in-line skate chassis; roller skates; quad skates; street sliders, namely, pairs of wheels which affix to footwear for pleasure and sports use; skate boards; protective gear, namely, knee guards, elbow guards, and wrist guards for protection of children at play; hockey goals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Aggressive Development International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by LIME ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LAST EXIT LAST EXIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 8, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 4, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |