Drawing for BIOPQQ

USPTO serial 77982476

BIOPQQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIOPQQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles M. Marmelstein

CHARLES M. MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5369UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in industry; sulphates; ammonium persulfate; nitrates, namely, lead nitrate, sodium nitrate; oxides; alcohols, namely, ethyl alcohol and methyl alcohol; glycol; ethers, namely, benzyl ethers, chloromethyl ethers; aldehydes; ketones; esters, namely, methyl esters; adhesives for use in industry; plant growth regulating preparations; fertilizers; ceramic glazings; non-metallic minerals, namely, sulpherACTIVEMar 7, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2011CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 25, 2011SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 25, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 22, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 22, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2011EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 28, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 14, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 19, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 12, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 15, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance