USPTO serial 77982695
DEC DEFENSE ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2012
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEC DEFENSE ELECTRONICS CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Defense Electronics Corporation
Pinellas Park, FL
Defense Electronics Corporation
Pinellas Park, FL
Defense Electronics Corporation
Pinellas Park, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel R. Frijouf
DANIEL R. FRIJOUF FRIJOUF, RUST & PYLE, P.A.201 E DAVIS BLVDTAMPA, FL 33606-3728UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | prototype fabrication, fabrication and assembly of mechanical, electrical, and electromechanical devices for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 25, 2011 |
| 042 | testing of mechanical, electrical and electromechanical devices for others; engineering research and development of mechanical, electrical, and electromechanical devices for others; software development for decision support applications sensors, monitoring and control systems for command, control, communications, computer operating software and software for generating information displays, all for use in military surveillance, software development for real-time embedded systems for use in satellite communications equipment, antenna beam steering control, and for unattended ground sensor systems used for surveillance; online system management services, namely, wireless monitoring and remote control of network devices; software development for digital signal processing systems, intelligent power management algorithms, image compression and encryption algorithms, and web enabling software for use in accessing the Internet; software development for human computer and graphical user interfaces (HCI/GUI), operating systems software development; software development for integration of line of sight terrestrial and satellite communications links, computer hardware and software; software development for embedded wireless networking; prototype design of mechanical, electrical and electromechanical devices for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 25, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Defense Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Defense Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Defense Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DEC DEFENSE ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 3, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 31, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |