USPTO serial 77983106
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mobile Messenger Americas Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Mobile Messenger Americas Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Mobile Messenger Americas Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam D. Resnick
N. Christopher Norton ARENT FOX LLP1717 K Street, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5342UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing consumer protection information and analysis; customer support services via internet and telephone, namely, customer service and product inquiry services for others; business monitoring services, namely, review and monitoring of promotional materials for adherence to consumer protection principles; analysis and review of advertising, namely, providing review and analysis of media content and promotions for mobile and other telecommunications devices; monitoring of media content and promotions for mobile and other telecommunications devices, namely, business consulting services related to monitoring quality of media content and promotions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 2011 |
| 036 | Providing infrastructure, system, network and service for payment by mobile telecommunications devices, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device as a payment apparatus; and providing consumer protection and security in financial transactions, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 2011 |
| 042 | Customer computer technical support services via internet and telephone, namely, live help desk services for mobile device-related commerce, operating systems, database systems, and web applications; providing consumer protection and security in financial transactions, namely, design and development of electronic data security systems; providing security for transactions in mobile and other telecommunications networks, namely, secure transaction services, specifically, providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted credit card transactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 2011 |
| 045 | Monitoring of media content and promotions for mobile and other telecommunications devices, namely, monitoring regulatory compliance with advertising and promotions laws and regulations; providing security for transactions in mobile and other telecommunications networks, namely, data authentication, specifically, authentication, issuance, and validation of digital certificates; providing security for transactions in mobile and other telecommunications networks, namely, data authentication, specifically, providing user authentication services in e-commerce transactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 30, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |