USPTO serial 77983144
CAR-ILLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4273778Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2013
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAR-ILLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane Shay Wald
JANE SHAY WALD IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4276UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances by a performance artist that features musical sounds created by playing a configuration of automobiles that form a musical instrument by connecting automobiles outfitted with speakers to a central automobile that is outfitted with a keyboard | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2012 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |