USPTO serial 77983180
COLORINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4198936Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 28, 2012
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COLORINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PUEBLA, PUEBLA, MX
PUEBLA, PUEBLA, MX
PUEBLA, PUEBLA, MX
PUEBLA, PUEBLA, MX
PUEBLA, PUEBLA, MX
PUEBLA, PUEBLA, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce T. Margulies
BRUCE T. MARGULIES NEIFELD IP LAW, PC5400 Shawnee Road, Suite 310ALEXANDRIA, VA 22312UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Powder for the preparation of flavored and sweetened gelatins and custard; salsas; spices; cookies prepared from wheat flour | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 5, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FERNANDO NUÑEZ ROMERO
- Other trademarks owned by FERNANDO NUÑEZ ROMERO
- Other trademarks owned by FERNANDO NUÑEZ ROMERO
- Other trademarks owned by MARIO NUÑEZ ROMERO
- Other trademarks owned by MARIO NUÑEZ ROMERO
- Other trademarks owned by MARIO NUÑEZ ROMERO
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named COLORINES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |