USPTO serial 77983231
WORKSHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4218252Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2012
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WORKSHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GRAND RAPIDS, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
MICHIGAN INDUSTRIAL TOOLS, INC.
GRAND RAPIDS, MI
MICHIGAN INDUSTRIAL TOOLS, INC.
GRAND RAPIDS, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jami A. Gekas
JAMI A. GEKAS FOLEY & LARDNER LLP321 NORTH CLARK STREETSUITE 2800CHICAGO, IL 60654-5313Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, bolt cutters; inspection tools in the nature of tongs and pincers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TEKTON, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Amash Imports, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Amash Imports, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MICHIGAN INDUSTRIAL TOOLS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICHIGAN INDUSTRIAL TOOLS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named WORKSHOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 22, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 16, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |