USPTO serial 77983261
BAUMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4226095Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2012
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BAUMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WIEN, AT
AGRO TECHNIK VERTRIEBS UND HOLDING GMBH
SCHWECHAT, AT
Other trademarks owned by AGRO TECHNIK VERTRIEBS UND HOLDING GMBH
AGRO TECHNIK VERTRIEBS UND HOLDING GMBH
SCHWECHAT, AT
Other trademarks owned by AGRO TECHNIK VERTRIEBS UND HOLDING GMBH
HFZ Hebefahrzeuge Beteiligung GmbH
Wien, AT
Other trademarks owned by HFZ Hebefahrzeuge Beteiligung GmbH
HFZ Hebefahrzeuge Beteiligung GmbH
Wien, AT
Other trademarks owned by HFZ Hebefahrzeuge Beteiligung GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan E. Schiavelli
ALAN E. SCHIAVELLI ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP1300 N 17TH STSTE 1800ARLINGTON, VA 22209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | loaders, stacking machines, material handling machines, namely, loading and unloading machines; power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, fork lifts and lifts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1983 |
| 012 | land vehicles for stacking in the nature of side loaders; four-way trucks, multi-way reach trucks and fork lift trucks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1983 |
| 037 | repair of machines, lifting and stacking devices, equipment and machines, and parts and accessories for the aforesaid goods; repair of stackers in the nature of side loaders, four-way trucks, multi-way reach trucks, fork lift trucks, and parts and accessories for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BULMOR HOLDING GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by AGRO TECHNIK VERTRIEBS UND HOLDING GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by AGRO TECHNIK VERTRIEBS UND HOLDING GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by HFZ Hebefahrzeuge Beteiligung GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by HFZ Hebefahrzeuge Beteiligung GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named BAUMANN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 8, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |