Drawing for PATO PASCUAL

USPTO serial 77983291

PATO PASCUAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4206388Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 11, 2012
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PATO PASCUAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A. Porter

CARL H PIERCE REED SMITH LLP2500 ONE LIBERTY PLACE1650 MARKET STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7301

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032carbonated and non-carbonated fruit drinksSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 30, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2014C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Nov 24, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 18, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Aug 30, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 11, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2012SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED—
Aug 4, 2012REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2012CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 18, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 17, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 16, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 9, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 9, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 9, 2012TPADTEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 12, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 4, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 8, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 30, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 11, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 6, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 4, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 6, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 6, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 6, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 12, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance