USPTO serial 77983355
STELLA & DOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STELLA & DOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randy Troxel
Randy Troxel Trademark-Associates1001 Bayhill Drive, Suite 200San Bruno, CA 94066UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Hair accessories, namely, hair clips, twisters, bands, barrettes, bows, buckles, ornaments, pins, and grips | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Luxe Jewels LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Luxe Jewels LLC
- Other trademarks owned by STELLA & DOT LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named STELLA & DOT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |