USPTO serial 77983449
EMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4298509Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 5, 2013
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shaw Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Other trademarks owned by Shaw Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.
Shaw Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Other trademarks owned by Shaw Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.
Shaw Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Other trademarks owned by Shaw Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pamela A. Baxter
PAMELA A. BAXTER KEAN MILLER HAWTHORNE D'ARMOND MCCOWAN & JARMAN LLPO BOX 3513BATON ROUGE, LA 70821-3513UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Consulting in the field of installation of equipment and machinery for the oxidation of mercury; consulting in the field of installation of equipment and machinery for reducing mercury emissions; consulting in the field of installation of equipment and machinery to aid in the oxidization of mercury and facilitate removal from flue gas; consulting in the field of installation of equipment and machinery to aid in removal of elemental mercury from coal fired boiler flue gases; construction of installations for oxidizing mercury; construction of installations for reducing mercury emissions; construction of installations for removing elemental mercury from coal fired boiler flue gases through the injection of hydrogen bromide; maintenance of installations for oxidizing mercury; maintenance of installations for reducing mercury emissions; maintenance of installations for removing elemental mercury from coal fired boiler flue gases through the injection of hydrogen bromide | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 2008 |
| 042 | Testing services in the field of mercury oxidation, namely, testing power plant emissions for mercury oxidation; testing services in the field of mercury emissions, namely, testing power plant emissions for mercury; testing services in the field of removing elemental mercury from coal fired boiler flue gases, namely, testing power plant emissions from coal fired boiler flues for elemental mercury; research and development in the field of removing elemental mercury from coal fired boiler flue gases; research and development in the field of reduction of mercury emissions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shaw Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Shaw Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Shaw Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EMO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |