USPTO serial 77983468
MQP MILL QUALIFICATION PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4261741Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2012
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MQP MILL QUALIFICATION PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica S. Sachs
JESSICA S. SACHS HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.STE 2005445 CORPORATE DRTROY, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business evaluation services, namely, measuring the performance of textile manufacturing facilities; compiling information and data for measuring the performance of textile manufacturing facilities; business analysis and evaluation of information and data relating to textile manufacturing facilities; benchmarking and comparing the performance of textile manufacturing facilities; business consulting services relating to the performance of textile manufacturing facilities; generating and preparing business reports relating to the performance of textile manufacturing facilities; providing a database for businesses to track, monitor and view reports relating to the performance of textile manufacturing facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 2008 |
| 042 | Evaluations relating to textile manufacturing facilities, namely, evaluations of performance in relation to quality and environmental sustainability; developing voluntary standards for textile manufacturing facilities performance in relation to quality, environmental sustainability, fair labor practices and safety standards; on-line quality evaluations relating to textile manufacturing; evaluating and testing the environmental sustainability of the manufacturing facilities of others; provision of information relating to the performance of textile manufacturing facilities specifically as it relates to quality and environmental sustainability | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intertek Group Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Intertek Group Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Intertek Group Plc
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MQP MILL QUALIFICATION PROGRAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 3, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |