USPTO serial 77983523
PLUGOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4328623Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 2013
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PLUGOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Petaluma, CA
Petaluma, CA
Petaluma, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jann Moorhead, Esq.
JANN MOORHEAD, ESQ. LAW OFFICE OF JANN MOORHEAD43 LA CRESCENTA WAYSAN RAFAEL, CA 94901-4212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | t-shirts, sweat shirts, headwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 7, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |