USPTO serial 77983570
Serial No. 77983570
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 3, 2013
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 77983570?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAINTE-MARIE, CA
Saint-Marie, Quebec, CA
Saint-Marie, Quebec, CA
Saint-Marie, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis J. Levy
Louis J. Levy Belles Katz LLC1800 John F. Kennedy Blvd.Suite 1010Philadelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | [ Cabinets, ] medicine cabinets [, mural cabinetry ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 25, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2011 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |