USPTO serial 78000425
FLEETXCHANGE WHERE FLEETS .COM TOGETHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEETXCHANGE WHERE FLEETS .COM TOGETHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EVELYN H. McCONATHY
EVELYN H MCCONATHY DILWORTH PAXSON LLP3200 MELLON BANK CTR1735 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7595Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others, namely, fleet parts, equipment and services and replacement part rates, by preparing and placing website links on a website accessed through a global computer network | ACTIVE | Jan 17, 2000 |
| 039 | Providing an on-line computer database in the field of fleet management for commercial transportation vehicles; fleet management on-line information services, namely, providing website links to other content providers in the field of fleet management for commercial transportation vehicles | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jan 17, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |